Blog No. 30: GST on Royalty paid for Mining Lease – Stay on operation of show cause notice(s)

๐“๐ก๐ž ๐‹๐š๐ฐ ๐จ๐ง ‘๐‘๐จ๐ฒ๐š๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฒ’

  1. The royalties in respect of mining leases are specified in Section 9 of Mining and Minerals (Regulation & Development) Act, 1957.
  2. State Governments have also promulgated legislations with respect to the levy.
  3. This law hails its constitutional backing from:
    1. ๐‹๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ ๐Ÿ: ๐”๐ง๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐‹๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ: 54. Regulation of mines and mineral development to the extent to which such regulation and development under the control of the Union is declared by Parliament by law to be expedient in the public interest.
    2. ๐‹๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ ๐Ÿ: ๐’๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐ž ๐‹๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ: 50. Taxes on mineral rights subject to any limitations imposed by Parliament by law relating to mineral development.

๐‘๐จ๐ฒ๐š๐ฅ๐ญ๐ฒ – ๐–๐ก๐ž๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ซ ๐“๐š๐ฑ ๐จ๐ซ ๐…๐ž๐ž? ๐Œ๐š๐ญ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ ๐ฉ๐ž๐ง๐๐ข๐ง๐  ๐›๐ž๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ž ๐’๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ž๐ฆ๐ž ๐‚๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ – ๐Ÿ— ๐›๐ž๐ง๐œ๐ก

  1. The consistent position upheld by judiciary is that – ‘Royalty is not a tax’. However, the embarrassment appears to be have been caused due to a decision of 7 member bench of SC in the case of India Cement (1990) 1 SCC 12 wherein it has been held to be a tax – a noting which has been argued to be a typo error.
  2.  Accordingly, the matter has been referred before 9 member bench of SC, to decide the issue. Refer: Mineral Area Development Authority etc. vs Steel Authority of India, CA No. 4056-4064 of 1999.

๐๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ž๐ซ ๐’๐ž๐ซ๐ฏ๐ข๐œ๐ž๐ฌ ๐“๐š๐ฑ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐†๐’๐“ ๐ฅ๐š๐ฐ

  1. The Honโ€™ble Supreme Court in SLP (C) No. 37326 of 2017 and W.P. (C) No. 1076 of 2021 (Lakhwinder Singh) has passed an interim order staying payment of services tax and GST respectively.

๐Ž๐ฎ๐ซ ๐‘๐ž๐ฆ๐š๐ซ๐ค๐ฌ

  1. The issue has now become a much litigated question of law.
  2. โ€˜Royalty’ and ‘tax on Royalty’ are very long pending matters in the judicial system of India which should be settled. The controversy started from the very beginning and continuing under GST as well.

If GST is leviable on Royalty, then it should come under supply of goods as this is charge payable to the Government in respect of the ore or mineral excavated, consumed or removed from the mines. At present, various AARs have classified it as a service under HSN 9973 attracting the rate of tax equal to like goods. As it has been classified as a service by AARs, the payment of GST is being made under reverse charge mechanism.
10. Recently, Hon’ble AP High Court has stayed the operation of Show Cause Notice – Refer: W.P. No. 30248 of 2021. The assessee’s shall also plan way forward in their respective cases.

Disclaimer

Website contains general information only and Paksh Legal is not, by means of this document, inviting, rendering , business, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form or manner. By accessing this website, www.pakshlegal.in, you acknowledge and confirm that you are seeking information relating to Paksh Legal of your own accord and that there has been no form of solicitation, advertisement or inducement by Paksh Legal or its members. This document is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. The content of this website is for informational purposes only.

I accept to above Disclaimer